Maine is cold.
(Some thoughts are less profound than others.)
|Michael on Catholicism and evolution|
|Bilbo Baggins on Dr. Oz is a piece of shit|
|marty on Dr. Oz is a piece of shit|
|Mildred baxter on Dr. Oz is a piece of shit|
|Mike on Circumcision: PZ Myers is stil…|
|shelldigger on Your definition of “clic…|
|Lyna Wstson on Scalia, as predicted|
|Scalia, as predicted… on A prediction on Scalia|
|Les on More cancer|
|Dave on Why circumcision is a very goo…|
This is a Letter to the Editor from today’s Kennebec Journal.
I don’t know about you but I am outraged to think that a felon can vote in Maine. Isn’t it wonderful that we have the reputation of being one of only two states in the country to allow a felon to vote?
Can you imagine that a pedophile who rapes a little child can vote? And, how about the adult rapist, the bank robber, the arsonist, the killer, the guys who used a machete to hack up those folks in Pittston and all the rest of the lowlifes.
I hope the editors of this newspaper write an editorial someday about this travesty of our law. The liberals like it because most of these punks vote for them. It’s easy to know why.
I will sign a petition to get this law changed. Is there an organization out there that will start one? Is there anybody or any group that will say “enough is enough?”
Is there a politician with guts enough to stand up and be counted and start the ball rolling? If the voters of this state don’t wake up and start electing people other than liberals, we will have such a mess that it will never get cleaned up.
C’mon folks, do something!
Despite the lazy outrage (“Someone else do it!”), I actually was quite pleased to see this letter. I wasn’t aware (or at least had forgotten) that Maine allowed felons to vote. This is excellent. Why should criminality bar someone the voting booth? Committing a felony says nothing of a person’s ability or (more importantly) right to vote. I see no good argument for it.
I do, however, see a great argument against it. We still tax felons, no? We still charge them fees for various registrations and whathaveyou. If we are going to force them to give money to the state for the benefit of the whole, we must also give them the right to have a say in what we do with that money. It is not the place of the state to permanently dictate to any person what it shall do with said person’s money. That is an unreasonable punishment. It amounts to a life-long fine. Worst yet, it strips people of certain fundamental rights. The right to vote should never be taken away from any person, no matter how heinous a crime has been committed.
But I would imagine Roland would prefer felons to vote. The vast majority of the prison population is Christian and against da gays. The whole group could be a boon for conservative issues (like bigotry and ignoring reason).
A couple from Pennsylvania has prayed their child to death.
A fundamentalist couple who prayed over their sick toddler rather than get medical help before his pneumonia death have been ordered to stand trial on manslaughter charges.
Prosecutors believe 2-year-old Kent Schaible succumbed because his parents chose prayer over modern medicine.
There may be some legitimate defense in this particular case, but there is a more important issue here.
Some states carve out exceptions to criminal neglect statutes for parents who rely on faith or spiritual healing.
These states (including my own) disgust me. Believing in magic is not a license to practice magic, especially when the life of another person is at stake.