About

My name is Michael Hawkins. I have degrees in Biology and Liberal Studies, as well as a minor in Philosophy.

In the summer of 2012 I worked on an NSF-funded study looking at the effects of wild turkeys on Maine agriculture. Wild turkeys can carry with them a number of zoonotic agents which may infect livestock and humans. In addition, the health of wild turkey populations is of interest to recreational hunters and, largely for economic reasons, state wildlife management. Relatively little has been done in terms of turkey populations in New England, so this study may prove regionally useful. I also briefly worked in the animal vaccine industry. The grossly underpaid animal vaccine industry.

This blog is devoted to evolution, atheism, civil rights, and whatever else tickles my fancy. It is geared towards defending the underlying theme of all of biology against the insult of creationism, ignorance, and misinformation. Also, sometimes I will use the British spelling of words, like “towards”. But most importantly, this blog is about science. First and foremost, science is the best way of knowing. It deserves a place high within any society. For the Sake of Science is here to fight against its undue degradation.

It is incredibly difficult to get banned here, so don’t come crying to me when someone upsets you. Especially if I’m the one who did it. I will basically only ban for spamming or trolling; I treat constitutionally protected speech the same way the constitution does: it is 100% allowed. This blog is not my living room or some other hogwash platitude we see espoused so often around the blogosphere. Consider FTSOS a public forum just as you would a city park or your town’s sidewalk. I hate to see stifled speech, and so I won’t stifle, but for the one and only example where I had to ban someone (that wasn’t a bot), see Mark Lindholm. He was allowed to be a scrote for some time, but then he spammed the hell out of the place, cluttering up the Recent Comments widget. It was like he was using his speech rights like someone uses speech rights to put flyers under windshield wiper blades, except he went a step further and glued the flyers to every square inch of the car. This joke was literally on FTSOS more than I was. He was initially only held in moderation so that other comments and discussions could be clearly seen in the widget, but then he assumed he was banned (despite being told otherwise) and circumvented his moderation, continuing with his incessant, whiny, childish spam. In turn, he actually was banned from posting (and embarrassing himself). (What’s more, he lied about discussions had elsewhere. That isn’t disallowed – if he wants to pretend he doesn’t believe anecdotal evidence is valid scientific evidence, something he has actually said multiple times, I won’t stop him – but it did make the banning rather easy to do.) Update: Now there are two examples. This other person has comments spanning a few different posts, so I won’t bother linking anything, but I will say that he was a very angry defender of quacks. He was constantly commenting on Andreas Moritz posts, but his primary concern was firing off insults at me. I highly suspect he has been around here before, but I can’t be sure. Where I can be sure, however, is in my assessment of him as a waste of everyone’s time. (He was also posting under several different names: Accaba, robscollett, Trader Haus, and Blues, attaching a different email to each name. The strikes me as at least a little suspicious.) As with Lindholm, he could have stayed as long as he wanted had he just not spammed.

There is a five-link limit per post. If you have more links than that in a post, it will automatically be caught by the spam filter and I may see it. Give me some time to find and approve it.

For a less snarky version of FTSOS, try Nothing But Science.

One Response

  1. Something interesting I found on the net:
    “The author of a book about the history of scientific revolutions described scientific theory as a suitcase that was intended to be filled with data, and needed to be able to accommodate all of it. If information was discovered that did not fit the theory, data would be hanging out of it and eventually the suitcase would no longer close properly. A new more capacious elegant suitcase-theory- would need to be invented”.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 204 other followers

%d bloggers like this: