Sex with obese individuals is unnatural, not intended by God, and thus wrong and immoral.
People are naturally attracted to healthy individuals. The obese are definitively not healthy. It follows, plainly and clearly, that any attraction to these people is a sexual perversion. Furthermore, those who are obese are gluttonous and thus sinners.
As a result of these facts, I propose a ban on all marriage to the obese. They harm society through their added burden to the healthcare system. They encourage children to think that obesity is acceptable, even though the Bible clearly bans it. Obesity is a scourge on the world which must be destroyed.
Only things deemed ‘natural’ and ‘intended by God’ can be considered normal, good, even moral. All else must go. It makes me go “Yuck!”
Filed under: Politics and Social | Tagged: bible, gay marriage, immoral, Moral, Natural, Obesity, Parody, Unnatural |
For the Sake of Science 
You are not God to make such comment about obese people. You have to help those sinners become unsinnable and bring them back to God. Ok?
Can you point to the place where God says obese people should be executed?
If you read his other posts you will realise that the author does not use the bible to justify his positions, this is a parody of people who do.
It is disgusting – a point well made I think.
God intended people to be healthy, no? If that’s the case, then what is against God’s intention is sin. It is wrong to live in sin. By sanctioning the marriage of the obese, we are sanctioning sin. We are telling children and society in general that it is okay to be morally perverse; we are saying that we will not take a stand against those who are sinners in the eyes of the Lord.
Obese marriage must be banned.
:lol:
Stick to the evolution, mate. Your theology sucks.
I think you mean literary criticism with a very narrow focus, not theology. It’s more accurate that way.
But quality response. You showed me just how wrong I was.
I mean, christ, you creationists are unwilling to go into detail in evidence for evolution, but your own weird mythology? Come on.
My weird mythology? You’re the one accusing fat people of some great crime and you’re onto my theology?
Mate, you need to learn to show some respect if you want anything approaching civil discourse.
I don’t think you get it.
I’m not surprised that the creationists here are having a hard time understanding the satire. Their worldview depends on being incapable of reading critically or thinking with any subtlety.
Obesity is also a sign of gluttony and sloth… more evidence of the moral corruption of the obese and further reason why we should should not endorse their lifestyle. The fact that obesity is on the rise in the US should be a call to action for all right-thinking people who are opposed to the obese agenda.
Show me in the bible where God calls too much fat a sin worthy of death.
Grant Dexter,
You said…
“Can you point to the place where God says obese people should be executed?”
and…
“Show me in the bible where God calls too much fat a sin worthy of death.”
Why do you keep asking this question?
I would also like to know why you’re attempting to set up this strange strawman.
Michael is claiming that “Sex with obese individuals is unnatural, not intended by God, and thus wrong and immoral. ”
I’d like him to point out where he is getting his whacky ideas from.
Seems pretty straightforward to me …
See the second paragraph. Is gluttony not a sin? Seems to me you ought to be familar with the source text on that.
What does that have to do with your repeated questions about execution and death?
The lovely thing about your comments is you’ve proved my point perfectly.
Yeah? One can be gluttonous and yet not fat, you know? Please share the scripture that says God requires us to execute fat people. While you’re at it you can post the one on gluttony as well.
PS. God does instruct governments to put to death homosexuals and adulterers. That is why I keep bringing up the death penalty. When you find some passages from the bible you can squeeze and mangle enough to try and fit with the bizarre notions you’re posting you can be well assured that the degree of the “sin” of gluttony is in no way comparable to the one of the sin of homosexuality.
You seem really obsessed with this execution of sinners business. Interesting. Nobody else here even suggested that obese people should be executed, but you jumped right to that suggestion. And now you are talking about executing adulterers and homosexuals. Fascinating.
I think you imagine that you are making some profound point by demanding that someone come up with a reason for executing the obese, but I’m not really sure what the point could be. I have to admit that I’m breathlessly waiting to find out.
Thanks for dismantling the OP.
First of all, Grant, it sounds like you’re advocating killing people based upon their inconsequential, private actions. What’s more, since you include adulterers, you appear to be advocating the deaths of many millions. You may want to rethink following such an evil theology.
The point I’m making here is that the Bible – and any holy text – offers justifications for just about anything. These books are just too malleable to be forces for good. There’s no way to objectively resolve the issue I’m raising here. Why not ban the obese from marriage? They engage in a form of gluttony. Sanctioning their relations is to say we’re tacitly approving their explicit sin. That’s nothing more than affront to God. Furthermore,
Not only is this an affront to God, but it’s an affront to one’s father (and presumably mother). That’s such a significant sin that God thought it proper to make it one of the Ten Commandments.
:lol:
Do not be fat is one of the ten commandments now?
Honor thy father and thy mother.
:rotfl:
Fat people dishonour their parents now?
Dude, just stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.
This is incredible. I literally roll my mouse scroller one notch in order to see the above Proverb. It may very well have been that when you posted, you didn’t need to scroll at all. You should have read it, making you recognize that your response is inconsistent with the Bible.
Yet here we are.
Proverb.
Law.
English isn’t your first language, right?
Astonishing. Even using his “inerrant” holy text, this guy is incapable of making the most obvious connections. I guess since some guy in a collar or a fat dude on the radio or TV didn’t tell him what to think, he can’t do it for himself.
So then God doesn’t support Proverbs 28:7?
Sex with a gorgeous, really fat woman is unbeatable. My girlfriend’s nearly 20 stone and she’s the most sensuous and adventurous woman I’ve known.
Have you ever made love to an obese woman? Don’t knock it till you’ve tried it!
God inspired the proverb. But nowhere did He write into law that fat people, or even people who eat too much, should be punished by the law.
There are thousands of proverbs and I’d guess very few of them have any legal backing. It’d be an interesting study.
At any rate, the point here is that I’m not taking huge leaps of logic to go from Proverbs to the Commandments to justifying something absurd. Even if I’m wrong according to the intentions of the original authors and subsequent scribes, there’s no way to resolve this issue objectively. The same applies to a lot to do with the Bible, including the issue of same-sex marriage.
:rotfl:
You are calling a proverb a law. That’s like suggesting “The grass is greener on the other side of the fence” means the police can arrest people for building tall fences.
You’re wrong because you’re not objective. There’s no reason to trust your assessment on any matter relating to the word of God.
Literary criticism usually isn’t objective. Symbolism is usually only interpreted correctly by original authors.
Why should I accept that?
Have you ever taken an English or Humanities course? Have you ever written anything for people in these courses? No one gives the same interpretation. You’ll often find you’re the only one who can accurately describe the symbolism, in full, behind your work.
You’re exaggerating. I’m sure it would be difficult for two people to agree on everything, but you’ll go a long way before you’ll find people willing to agree with your weird notions expressed in this thread.
Sorry, mate. A proverb is a proverb and a law is a law. Some proverbs have a legal precedent, but most do not. And only a glue sniffing scholar would argue otherwise.
Oh your god. It’s convenient that anything ever said in Proverbs is exempt from being the word of God if you don’t like the conclusions.
Regardless of where the goalposts land, it remains that God hates gluttony, both in terms of eating and more abstract measures. Marrying a true glutton who embraces overeating without shame is something which God must detest.
Hell, I can cede all the ground in the world to you and the Bible keeps supporting this view; God made this one of his seven deadly sins; he promotes good health. Your god hates continued gluttony and could never support its promotion in the form of marriage.
Show me the law that God wrote where fat people, or people who eat too much, should not be allowed to marry. Show me any law against gluttony.
The word of God is as it is written. It has proverbs written against gluttony and for restraint and healthy living. You claiming that those proverbs are laws is simply not good enough.
you are soo wierd and wrong….
whats your problem…were you sooo fat b4 you couldnt see your nose.
…..
you need help
This is probabaly the most ignorant thing I have read in a long time, truth be told it rings of nazi notions and ideology; that anything remotely different is unclean and threrfore must be destroyed…did it ever occur to you that fat can be lost, controlled and the like,you would murder a person for something that can be changed? they live with it not you, its a muteable state of being not a crime.
As for you twisting the words of the good book, a glut refers to anyone doing an excess of anything not just eating food; anything to an excess is a sin, but all sins can be forgiven, your words cannot. Smarten up buddy you ARE WRONG IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD. I can’t believe you even got away with publishing this fault ridden rubbish…chew on that for a bit,at least its calorie free and ths passes your standards
your mamma & T dot princess,
Neither one of you understood the point of this post. Research “satire”.
I can almost hear this speech coming from a pulpit.
oh my god! Didn’t anyone realize that this whole thing was a satire! It shows how crazy the bible really is! It’s insane! My grandfather is a priest and I lived my entire youth in private shcool and guess what GOD DOES HATE FATTIES! It isn’t because they are fat, if they become fat by eating too much and sleeping all the time…that is gluttony! GLUTTONY IS ONE OF THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS! It has nothing to do with the big ten! But it is located in leviticus which is THE HEBREW BOOK OF LAW! Just because it isn’t in the ten doesn’t mean it isn’t what god wants…that would mean the entire new testiment is out of bounds! Also, the bible is filled with crazy laws and judgments! If a man touches a woman who is on her period he can be stoned, if a woman bleeds on anything it must be burned. A man can have many many wives as long as he can afford them, but if a woman commits adultry she is killed. THIS IS ALL CRAZY! No one can take any stock in that! Reading the bible has taught me that it was more written by man than any god! Violence, curletry, rape and irrationality are littlered within this text so that you have to shovel through the shit to find the real diamonds of forgiveness! yeesh!
The end/
You are a disgusting arrogant and sad sad excuse for a human. Jesus Christ came to fufil the law laid out in the old testament let he who is without sin cast the first stone etc. I pray for your soul and your enlightment. Short of that may god make you fat someday!
Haha.
I know its satire (which Michael is particularly bad at) but even as satire its premise is flawed. If `sinners` weren`t allowed to marry, then no one could marry, Fortunately being a sinner doesn`t neccesarily undermine the purpose of marriage.
If we let fat people continue marrying, soon we’ll have a whole host of individuals who cannot achieve penetration. The whole purpose of marriage will be doomed!
Plus God hates fatties.
I think you just crossed the line into one sick puppy territory,
If the whole point of marriage is procreation, and fatness presents a physical barrier to it, why should we encourage such things? Or, more simply, the fact that fat people have sex less often points to a likely decrease in children. Won’t somebody think of the children?
Well, actually, if someone were of a weight that made them terribly unhealthy, then I think a case could be made that they should gain some self-control before entering into a relationship that requires significant self-control.
However, as weight is a condition that is constently changing in any human being (as is health, incidentally) their is no basis for the state to make laws concerning such things. This is quite different from the state having to change the actual definition of marriage to allow two persons to pretend that the relationship they are in is in fact a marriage.
But it’s all just a choice! Fat, gay, straight (like when we chose to be straight, amirite, bro?)! Choice, choice, choice!
Sure; but I don’t know what that has to do with what I said.
Gay people can get married to straight people once they choose to stop being gay. Fat people can get married to thin people once they choose to stop being fat. It’s all in the Bible.
the satire was good… but the thread of comments following it is hilarious : )
I agree 100% with the poster. Fat people should be incarcerated until their BMI falls back into a normal range and then should be placed on a type of parole, where if they violate by gaining weight, they will be placed back in prison
“Gay people can get married to straight people once they choose to stop being gay. Fat people can get married to thin people once they choose to stop being fat. It’s all in the Bible.”
Hahaha!