Andreas Moritz

Andreas Moritz is some schmuck offering horrific medical advice about cancer. I’ve never heard so many wrong things about science outside the realm of creationism.

What makes 50% of the American population so prone to developing cancer, when the other half has no risk at all? Blaming the genes for that is but an excuse to cover up ignorance of the real causes. Besides, any good genetic researcher would tell you that such a belief is void of any logic and outright unscientific (as explained in the book).

Crackpot. He may want to define “good” in his description of genetic researchers. It sounds like he is confusing it with “horrible”. Cancer risk is often identified in three primary ways. In no order, there is environment. A smoker or frequent tanner have higher risk because they have carcinogens entering their bodies at higher rates than other people. Then there is familial history. A person with a history of cancer in the family needs to be more vigilant in seeking regular check-ups. This is based on nothing but genetics. Finally, oncologists specifically look at genes to determine whether or not someone has a high risk. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes indicate a higher risk of cancer if inherited with mutations. This is common among Ashkenazi Jews. This is basically a repeat of point 2. But it’s good to repeat here because, well, cancer is caused by mutations in genes which cause unregulated cell growth which prevents apoptosis or prevents DNA repair.

Cancer has always been an extremely rare illness, except in industrialized nations during the past 40-50 years. Human genes have not significantly changed for thousands of years. Why would they change so drastically now, and suddenly decide to kill scores of people? The answer to this question is amazingly simple: Damaged or faulty genes do not kill anyone. Cancer does not kill a person afflicted with it! What kills a cancer patient is not the tumor, but the numerous reasons behind cell mutation and tumor growth. These root causes should be the focus of every cancer treatment, yet most oncologists typically ignore them. Constant conflicts, guilt and shame, for example, can easily paralyze the body’s most basic functions, and lead to the growth of a cancerous tumor.

Christ. Cancer really hasn’t been that rare throughout human history, but it is more common today. The reasons, however, are not because people are negative nancies. People live longer, are exposed to more carcinogens, and we just plain detect cancer more often than past generations could.

Copying errors are at root here. Moritz is claiming something which is bogus and unevidenced. He is saying a huge swath of the population dies because they are guilty. His ‘evidence’ seems to be anecdotal experience and personal perception. This guy is dangerous, if anything.

If cancer deaths were purely related to one’s emotional state, then it follows that people in Japan, France, and the U.S. must be more chipper than the rest of the world. No, it certainly isn’t about the availability of medical treatment. These people are just happy.

Cancer patients typically suffer from lack of self-respect or worthiness, and often have what I call an “unfinished business” in their life. Cancer can actually be a way of revealing the source of such inner conflict. Furthermore, cancer can help them come to terms with such a conflict, and even heal it altogether. The way to take out weeds is to pull them out along with their roots. This is how we must treat cancer; otherwise, it may recur eventually.

So I guess cancer is a good thing now. Quick! We’ve got to tell the hospitals. We need psychiatrists, not oncologists!

Oh, and children who have faulty genes that cause cancer? Nah. They just don’t have any self-respect. That’s common of children, right?

~~~

This is amazing. Does Moritz realize that 30% of all cancer deaths are due to smoking (or inhaling second hand smoke)? He must think smokers are negative nancies, too. It’s a good thing they’re getting cancer. Otherwise, they’d never find out what was spiritually wrong. I mean, why do we feel so off-put by the idea of cancer? It’s clearly just a method of discovering out innerselves. Or it’s a horrible disease that is caused by a copying error in one cell which is able, through many complex mechanisms, to replicate without ‘fear’ of death while avoiding the attacks of the immune system. I don’t know. I only have empirical evidence to back up my claims.

P.s. This guy is an awful writer, too.

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. You also attacked Mr Moritz in your article on his death did you not? You have any idea that ALL HUMANS are flawed and along with the truth they report will also make errors…therefore you TAKE WHAT WORKS, and discard the rest…MANY THOUSANDS of people have received massive health boosts from his liver/gallbladder cleanse, and also the kidney cleanse tea which anyone can make from simple herbs…as mentioned there are things he does tell which are somewhat off, yet to throw everything out because you perhaps had one or two bad experiences with natural medicine (and have your head shoved far up the greedy pharmaceutical industries asz) is a great dis-service to all people who may listen to your insanity/imbalance. What you need to understand before you attack people is what their actual stance is, you have next to no idea of any of the truth Andreas has taught, and that is why your attacks are so lacking in any substance/proof. I recommend that you understand the balance in adsorbing correct information, and realize that I would pick THE LIVER GALLBLADDER CLEANSE, over any garbage that you come out with from your biased and asinine attacks…try sharing correct information as best you can, and when you find you have made an error, REVISE OR CORRECT IT, I know that will take some degree of ability to be humble, yet you can not blame anyone else for your foolish pride. All good medicine has a place, you can save lives with far greater ease when your narrow mind can surpass the blocks that you have put up in hatred towards everything else that you fear currently.

  2. My post and comments on his death can be seen here:

    https://forthesakeofscience.com/2012/10/28/andreas-moritz-is-dead/

    And here:

    https://forthesakeofscience.com/2012/11/03/what-killed-andreas-moritz/

    I don’t take joy in his death and I’m not happy he’s dead, but his passing doesn’t change the fact that he wasn’t a doctor. It doesn’t change the fact that he recommended unproven, quack treatments that put people in danger – not only due potentially dangerous treatments themselves, but also due to people possibly not seeking real treatment.

  3. You and I both know how many deaths doctors are responsible for, and yes you seemed to take relish in the fact he was dead, and hoped to insinuate it was from cancer as well. You also did nothing to address how many people have benefited from his correct information, even though obviously after all your attacks you have received information about this knowledge. As suggested in my above post, learn that you can not just suck energy from people in an unbalanced way, this blog appears to be one of your prime methods for doing so, for it is completely one sided without any balance or compassion even from what I can tell, you say you took no relish in his death, then why attack him immediately after such if that was true? Only thing I believe you wished for more than his death, was that it was from cancer. You forget that nothing you have said here is in any way a reflection of the truth he shared, then you expect people to agree with you when you try and make yourself look human by stating things we have no way or proving, you have more in common with the occasional lies that Mr Moritz taught that you care to admit I am sure. You also were fast to jump on this comment and make a response as well, any particular reason for that, or is it more an energy vamp thing? https://www.youtube.com/user/enerchiTV

  4. Moritz was a quack and no one benefited from any medical advice he gave because he wasn’t able to give any that was accurate. He didn’t have any medical education, nor was he even vaguely honest.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: