I hate finals week. Hate it.
On the plus side, my degrees are done bar a single course (which is ever-so-conveniently offered two semesters from now).
I think most people know where this is:
For those who don’t know where it is, I bet most have still at least seen this image. It’s of Yosemite Valley in Yosemite National Park in California. Notice the square shape of the valley. This is unusual because valleys tend to be formed by two things: rivers and/or glaciers. Rivers result in a V-shape due to their cutting action and glaciers result in a U-shape due to weight and grinding. So why is Yosemite Valley square?
The answer actually does lie in the geological activity of glaciers. When a glacier moves, it has a lot of mass and power behind it. That means it can easily bring tons and tons of rocks and debris along for the ride. Go on a hike anywhere reasonably far from the equator and glacial erratics will not be uncommon.
In the case of Yosemite Valley, a glacier moving through it brought more than a few erratics. In fact, it was more than just one glacier. Over millions of years many glaciers have run through the park, creating a massive lake where we see sheer cliffs in the first picture. On one end of this lake was a moraine, a collection of rocks pushed forward by the weight of all that ice. They built up on each other and formed what was essentially a damn. This allowed the lake to also form, filling in what was then a U-shape. Of course, that shape was still underneath all that water.
So the question that may be popping up from all this is, What is it that lakes do that is important here? The answer is that they create sediment. And with enough time, all that sediment adds up. In the case of Yosemite Valley, it added up to the point where it filled in that U-shape, creating the square we know today.
Here is the epitome of nationalism:
Here is what I just read on Facebook:
Why don’t you go tell every veteran that they are racist then.
Agreeing to die for you nation is pretty nationalistic. But then again, you apparently wouldn’t understand that. Nationalism can also be inclusive; not inherently divisive and racist. But then again, maybe you don’t understand that either
Go ask a soldier and get back to me. If you don’t like our nation then move out.
These were all responses to another person’s posts contending and explaining why nationalism is categorically racist. (He was using “racist” with some liberty, but that was never really even the issue.) It may be the least fruitful discussion I have ever seen on Facebook. It’s like the person conflating patriotism with nationalism has never even considered these arguments. I…I’m speechless. I have to let George Orwell take over:
A nationalist is one who thinks solely, or mainly, in terms of competitive prestige. He may be a positive or a negative nationalist — that is, he may use his mental energy either in boosting or in denigrating — but at any rate his thoughts always turn on victories, defeats, triumphs and humiliations. He sees history, especially contemporary history, as the endless rise and decline of great power units, and every event that happens seems to him a demonstration that his own side is on the upgrade and some hated rival is on the downgrade. But finally, it is important not to confuse nationalism with mere worship of success. The nationalist does not go on the principle of simply ganging up with the strongest side. On the contrary, having picked his side, he persuades himself that it is the strongest, and is able to stick to his belief even when the facts are overwhelmingly against him.
Update: I usually make it a point to not publish names that come from non-public discussions, but whereas this person defriended the status maker over my comments, I don’t feel bad to say that I think Allyson McCreery is a twit who deserves zero respect.
Globaia.org has put together a great video of the impact humanity has had on the world over the past several hundred years. I think the worst part has to be the fact that CO2 levels in the atmosphere today are higher than they’ve been in the past million years or so. But hey. Maybe it’s just coincidence, amirite?
I attended an awards dinner tonight as part of a school function and the keynote speaker was none other than Maeghan Maloney. In addition to representing quacks, she also represents the 57th district of the State of Maine and gets her name around a surprising amount, including at UMA. (Despite my largely negative opinions of her, I do have to give her credit for not being a lazy legislator.) I found out she would be speaking only after I agreed to attend, but I would have gone anyway. I don’t care to engage with her in any way, but I’m certainly not going to avoid things because she will be there; the same goes for her husband. (He wasn’t in attendance.)
Most of her speech was political in nature and even if I had no idea who she was, I wouldn’t have enjoyed it. (And really, had I given a speech at this thing I wouldn’t expect people to be on the edge of their seats.) However, two things did catch my attention. The first was from the person introducing her:
Meagan Maloney cares about social justice.
I have my doubts.
The second comes from her. I’m only going to give the first part of the quote because I ended up finishing it in my head without listening to what she actually said:
People who give back most in civic engagement…
…are pro-bono lawyers who fight for the First Amendment.
I don’t know as she would agree, though.
One thing to which I was looking forward was her handing me my award. I had every intention of smiling and being cordial, but the humor of the situation really tickled me. Unfortunately, the way things happened to work out was that my bio/Haiti professor handed us our awards because I guess it was faster. We took pictures after that and Mrs. Maloney didn’t join us. She did for the other groups, but I presume the matter of the situation dictated a little prudence on her part. I was going to make it a point to not stand right next to her out of concern for not being a social douche anyway, but staying separate was understandable.
Now if I could just see her separated from her seat I would be perfectly happy.
This is from one of the people running Real Hope for Haiti, the group that runs the major health facility for the village I visited:
Milienne went home this past weekend to her grandmothers house. They have never been able to locate her mother for 3 years now. Her grandmother will have to decide what she is wanting to do. There is talk of adoption but she has not made a final decision yet. She was well and healthy when she returned home.
I hope things work out for the best for her.