For the Sake of Science

Thought of the day

7 Responses

1. 

   NewEnglandBob, on January 2, 2011 at 6:27 am said:

   It is guaranteed to be horseshit if it appears on any Fox media where the horseshit quota is almost 100%.
2. 

   nate, on January 2, 2011 at 8:40 am said:

   I’m always surprised at the mature manner in which you comment.
3. 

   NewEnglandBob, on January 2, 2011 at 11:15 am said:

   Oh, I offend your home news channel…LOL

   EVer have an intelligent comment, Nate? There is no evidence of it.
4. 

   nate, on January 2, 2011 at 11:31 am said:

   I’ll let you know as soon as you post an intelligent comment I can compare to.

   Since 90% of the stuff on a given channel is regurgitated from the AP anyways I really don’t see very much difference in content between channels. You want to focus on the opinion part and you seem to miss the whole idea of what opinion is.

   I watch Fox, CNN, MSNBC in roughly equal proportion, just so you know. I don’t really have a ‘home’ channel.
5. 

   Michael Hawkins, on January 2, 2011 at 12:45 pm said:

   Most of the stories that claim some big game-changer are just a lot of hype – and they are often fueled by a self-interested researcher or two with access to the media.
6. 

   NewEnglandBob, on January 2, 2011 at 1:19 pm said:

   …anyways I really don’t see very much difference in content between channels.

   Wrong again, as usual. Fox channels are extremely biased to the right wing and religious positions, even on news reports. They don’t even try to be unbiased.
7. 

   morris, on January 2, 2011 at 2:15 pm said:

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk34w6luoUg

   Darwin’s Designer Dogs – Not