Thought of the day

Apparently there’s this low-budget, no-name movie floating around at these unheard of giant theaters. I think it’s called Avatar and it’s playing at an IMAX.

Be jealous.

Thought of the day

There isn’t a god, but if there was one, he probably wouldn’t care about your sex life.

Thought of the day

Christians lie about homosexuality.

So do most other religions, conservatives, and secular bigots, but Christians seem to have the market cornered.

Thought of the day

I despise most political correctness. Listen, it’s a bad thing to be mentally compared to a retard. We understand a retard to be someone who is unable to cognitively operate on a level anywhere near the average. That is not the fault of the retarded person, but it is still obviously a bad thing to not have any actual mental defect and still be comparable to such a person. And clearly the term gets bandied about far more broadly than as it pertains to intelligence. A case can be made against that use, perhaps. But if you get in fights, abuse drugs, or otherwise do generally stupid things, you’re a frickin’ retard.

And let’s just say “black”. Not “African-American”. Black. It isn’t accurate, but it really isn’t meant to be accurate. Neither is “white”. And what really gets me is that plenty of black people aren’t from America. “African-Canadian” isn’t a term anyone hears very often and the reason is that it’s just superficial political correctness. No one is thinking “I’m representing what and who this person is when I say ‘African-American.'” No. People just internalize the term as being socially acceptable.

And let’s just say “Indians”. Say “Native Americans” if a distinction is really needed, but “Indians” shouldn’t be offensive. Yeah, Columbus thought he was in India and the people he saw have vaguely similar skin color to what he would have expected. It’s an understandable mistake given the context. The fact that it gave birth to the Indian meme should not be viewed as a big deal. The term is not derogatory and was never intended as such.

This thought of the day is a 3-fer.

Thought of the day

In short, there is plenty of reason to challenge religions and contest their doctrinal claims, not just as an academic exercise, but as a matter of real urgency. Atheists and sceptics should deny the authority of religious organisations and leaders to pronounce on matters of ultimate truth and correct morality. This will require persistent, cool argument, but also moments of outright denunciation or even unashamed mockery of religion’s most absurd actions and truth-claims.

~Russell Blackford

Thought of the day

C.S. Lewis is a terrible philosopher.

Thought of the day

Happiness is happiness and morality is morality and sadness is sadness and joy is joy because it all must end.

Thought of the day

I see no reasoning given as to why good and evil ultimately being subjective also automatically makes them meaningless. The only argument ever put forth is that subjective morality = meaningless. That’s a bad equation.

Thought of the day

Are we really such a weak and cowardly race that we must concoct these silly rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious: there doesn’t seem to be a God, or at least one who is loving and powerful? Can’t we admit that bad things are simply bad things and not some manifestation of a tortured and incomprehensible divine calculus? When will our species grow up?

~Jerry Coyne

Thought of the day

I literally just had a fit of laughter reading the comments on a post about Andreas Moritz.