For the Sake of Science

A valid question

3 Responses

1. 

   NewEnglandBob, on December 14, 2010 at 5:11 am said:

   Biblical ethics – now there is an oxymoron.
2. 

   nate, on December 14, 2010 at 7:37 am said:

   I wasn’t going to comment on this one. Its a comic, a waste of time, but since you had to give it a nasty little comment I changed my mind.

   Ethics describes any moral philosophy. Stalin’s ‘ethical’ adherence could have been flawless given his own personal morality. Same with every other person on the earth at every time in history and on into the future.
3. 

   nate, on December 14, 2010 at 7:39 am said:

   I meant IS just moral philosophy. a few reworkings of the sentence and just having woken up not helping, but I’m sure you got my point.