Franks, please

Suzanne Franks doesn’t even realize the principles behind her caricature ideology. That’s the only reason she would say something like this.

March is women’s history month, but don’t let that circumscribe your fun. You can get together with a posse of your like-minded women friends and mock mansplainers anytime. Now, I know many of you have just recently learned that there even existed a name you could attach to this annoying behavior plaguing your existence. Believe me, I know how important naming experience is – that’s why I have a whole category assigned to the topic. But your joy need not begin and end with just knowing that the craptastic manifestations you’ve been subjected to are (1) not your fault, (2) part of a larger system of patriarchy, and (3) mocked by many, many, many women all over the place.

Feminism is a philosophy of consequence. Intention is largely ignored and emphasis is placed upon the results. For example, non-sexually based images are considered sexist in (caricature) feminism due to that number (2) Franks mentioned – “a larger system of patriarchy”. Let that sink in for a moment. Okay, now review (1), which I made bold. If Franks was consistent at all, she would consider her explanations of where blame lies to be useless. That is, if consequence is what matters, then the fact that caricature feminists are presenting their ‘case’ in a way that seems to fix blame on men should be disconcerting to them. The very thing against which they rail – negative consequences that make people feel guilty, ashamed, bad, etc – is what Franks has promoted.

Gorilla becomes aware of own mortality

E = Mr. Deity

Ironic quote of the day

From Rick C on my Andreas Moritz post.

I bet you could count your friend on less than half of one hand, and when it comes to pleasantry you have less than 1000th of a brain. Back Off with your foul abuse

Is is possible to count a single friend on more than “half of one hand”? And what constitutes precisely half of a hand? Does Rick C have half of a finger? Does he not use fingers for counting? How does one measure pleasantry in terms of the brain? Does it go by mass or volume?

And there it is

Suzanne Franks has officially declared herself right by banning me from her blog. For someone as educated as she is, it’s surprising that she doesn’t realize it is unreasonable to say “Here’s why you’re wrong…hey! why are you responding?!?”

But then, she’s the sort of person who gets offended when others won’t play her Internet fantasy games by calling her “Zuska”.

Quote of the day

From PZ’s Andreas Moritz is a cancer quack post.

Lol …..

@ PZ Myers!

Who really the quack after all.

Im or you.

Christopher Maloney rolls out new product line

Old but apt

Old in Interwebblings terms means two months ago, of course.

Help the insurance companies

FunnyorDie embedding sucks.

Go here for a PSA on helping the big guy.

God wasn’t such a good guy

*nor is he.