Moritz really likes the attention!

So I guess keep giving him more, right? Here’s the email he sent me after I asked him if he was seriously unaware of the Streisand Effect.

Oh, I am actually very grateful to you for spreading the word and creating a free publicity campaign for me. A lot of people who would never have heard about me, may now wonder and start to investigate. Eventually, they may want to know for themselves what this is about and buy some books of mine. I couldn’t have asked for a more effective advertising campaign. In fact, my stat counter shows that I had a 563% increase in genuine visitors yesterday and as of this early morning it is already double the number. So if it continues out be a huge success I may send you a check. I don’t mind the dozen swear emails, when my business is booming, thanks to your awareness campaign. I never had such a spike of interest in my work. Thanks again, you turned out to be a great blessing. And please, keep it going.

You hear that? He’s got all sorts of new visitors. Business must be booming. There’s no way nearly all of these new visitors could actually be people who despise everything he does. Right?

Oh, and the first result on Google right now is Orac’s post.

All about Maloney and Moritz

The tremendous outpouring of support has been a tad overwhelming to say the least. I literally spent 4 straight hours reading posts after work yesterday, took a shower, then spent another several hours reading more. It seems like today there’s an even larger supply of material to read.

Given just how much is out there, I am going to do my best to list out all the links here. It isn’t possible for me to find them all, so any additions are welcome in the comment section. I’ll do my best to update this post accordingly.

PZ Myers:

Christopher Maloney is a quack.

Christopher Maloney: Still a quack

Do not harass the quacks!

Andreas Moritz is a cancer quack

Why quacks ought to lie low

Orac:

Andreas Moritz and trying to shut down valid scientific criticism: A sine qua non of a quack

RichardDawkins.net:

Andreas Moritz is a cancer quack

Steven Novella:

Naturopaths Can Silence Critics Too

I Speak of Dreams:

Repeating PZ Myers: Christopher Maloney Is A Quack (and cowardly, and WordPress is craven) But Andreas Moritz is Worse: A Dangerous Cancer Quack

Twitter:

Search for Christopher Maloney

Search for Andreas Moritz

Search for Michael Hawkins

Search for More legal threats from quacks. PZ Myers on Andreas Moritz. RT to help Michael Hawkins

(Might I recommend using “naturopathy” as a tag?)

Random Thoughts:

Andreas Moritz is a Quack

Not a Potted Plant:

Christopher Maloney is a Cowardly Quack (UPDATED)

Newsvine:

iarnuocon: Christopher Maloney is a quack

A Hot Cup of Joe:

Christopher Maloney is a Quack

Jthewonderllama’s Totally Amazing Blog:

Christopher Maloney is a quack.

All Rocks go to Heaven:

Dear WordPress: You Suck

horsegoeswest:

When you got nothing, sue

Evening Person:

Blogger’s site taken down by quacks

The Digital Cuttlefish:

He’s a Maine-i-quack!

Hang on one cotton-picking…

One of the things WordPress told me was that “If [Maloney] is a doctor you cannot say or infer he is not.” Well, looksie here.

2. Title. A licensee must use the title “naturopathic doctor.” Naturopathic doctors have the exclusive right to the use of the terms “naturopathic doctor,” “naturopathic,” “naturopath,” “doctor of naturopathic medicine,” “doctor of naturopathy,” “naturopathic medicine,” “naturopathic health care,” “naturopathy” and the recognized abbreviation “N.D.” Use of the title “physician” by the licensee is prohibited.

According to this, naturopaths cannot refer to themselves as doctors. If one says otherwise, he is breaking the law. So the statement “A naturopath is not a doctor” is true because a naturopath is only a “naturopathic doctor” or any one of the above combinations.

My take

I’ve been home for about two and a half hours…and I’m still wearing my work clothes. I’ve been reading all the posts, from PZ to Dr. Novella. (PZ has several posts.) I can hardly respond to all the details – and, really, should I? This blog is still on WordPress. Who knows what will make them shut me down again?

I do want to respond to a couple points. First,

The only problem I have with this is that Doctor Maloney, while being a quack, is actually a doctor. If Maine officially says he’s a doctor, then he’s a doctor, and he would rightly “target” any blog that libels him by saying otherwise.

All a blogger would have to do is edit his posts to say that Maloney is not a doctor by the standards of other states, and does not have the same qualifications as a medical doctor.

This is precisely what I did. I specifically said Maloney is a doctor by Maine standards. I then went on to criticize those standards while also pointing out that by common medical standards, the status of naturopaths in Maine is in doubt.

Then there’s this from Maloney himself.

After failing to get an editorial published against God he decided I was, flatteringly, next on the list.

Actually, I did get that published. The link to the Kennebec Journal’s website no longer works since they updated everything (as of today), but I reprinted the letter in full in my post – my post which came nearly a month before my letter about Maloney. Don’t worry. I still hate religion (and even more than I hate naturopathy, believe it or not).

In honor of trog69

I post this video in honor of trog69’s comment on Bailey’s Irish Cream. Do watch the whole thing.

Today’s horoscope

Do something vaguely positive. But watch out for vaguely negative consequences. And above all, be direct and ambiguous.

The mind of the caricature feminist

Here is what happens in reality.

Here is that reality after it has gone through the mind of a caricature feminist.

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Hang on, Pat.

I thought God was mad at New Orleans for their sins? But how did they win the Super Bowl? And then Drew Brees said “God is great”?! B-but this must mean Pat Robertson was wrong! Noooooooo!!!!

Rowsdower!

Cat