For the Sake of Science

Thought of the year

4 Responses

1. 

   NewEnglandBob, on January 1, 2011 at 12:26 pm said:

   Pass it on.
2. 

   nate, on January 1, 2011 at 1:11 pm said:

   What happened to ‘there is no evidence of any gods’?
3. 

   Michael Hawkins, on January 1, 2011 at 2:30 pm said:

   I would also say there is no evidence of unicorns, but that isn’t going to make me too uncomfortable to also say there are no unicorns.
4. 

   nate, on January 1, 2011 at 2:48 pm said:

   Unlike you to make a claim that you don’t have evidence to back up though. Much more the case to stick to the facts, the facts are there is no evidence of god or gods but hasn’t been proved that there are not. Semantics perhaps, but that’s what we have to deal in.

   By the evidential standard given here it could be said that there are gods, that would be an equally valid claim.