This is fantastic.
via PZ
Filed under: Atheism/Humanism, Philosophy, Science | Tagged: Scientists talk about God |
Author
Michael holds a BA in Biology with a minor in Philosophy. He likes to spend his free time hiking and defending science, though not usually at the same time. Contrary to popular (but not scientific) belief, the positive and appropriate perception of science is undermined by religion, alternative medicine, the U.S. education system, and most science journalists.
Recent Comments
Mele Kalikimaka | Fo… on Merry Christmas somdeblahiriyahoocoi… on Thought of the day Michael on Wuhan virus and one last… Quick correction | F… on The A-Unicornist, Bernie Bro… The A-Unicornist, Be… on When I know I’ve beat… Somdeb Lahiri on Thought of the day Somdeb Lahiri on Thought of the day Allen Stone on This is the logic of anti-abor… Steve on Don’t do business with B… Hank on Why circumcision is a very goo…
If only this exchange was on videotape, it’d be perfect for the video http://archive.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=736
1) The writer of the article is an ass. Citing St. Paul’s claim that ‘we all know that God exists so too bad atheists!’ is the same thing as calling the opposition liars. It’s a refusal to engage the arguments. 2) It’s unfortunate that Friedman believes atheism is the claim that “I know there is no God”. Richard Dawkins, the most recognizable atheist in the world, would never make such a claim.
I’ve been in the same camp from before I was a Friedmanite – that’s why I choose the agnostic label. I have no problem with people using different definitions of atheist and agnostic – I label Dawkins an agnostic under my use of the term. It’s a minor label issue.
I do love how he totally unnecessarily hit the guy with an evolution shout-out by saying peoples values tend to be universal:
“…Which leads me to believe that they are a product of the same evolutionary process that accounts for the rest of our customs as well as physical characterizations.”