This is why I don’t respect William Lane Craig

Posted on September 3, 2012 by Michael

William Lane Craig was presented with this from a fellow Christian:

Dear Dr. Craig

I have a question regarding the cause of the universe. We Christians hold God to be the cause and explanation of the natural world, yet Atheists frequently respond to me saying that you cannot apply causality to the universe itself. Because the universe is all of time and space, and since causality presuposses time and space, therefore the universe cannot have a cause.

So asking what the cause or the explanation of the universe is becomes meaningless.

So how can we say that God caused the universe or is the sufficient reason for the contigent existence of the universe if you cannot apply causality outside of time, or better said, if you cannot apply causality to time and space itself?

Could you help me out? Does the whole notion of causality indeed require the existence of spacetime?

God bless

Janey

I’ve addressed the First Cause argument in the past. Layman logic can get one to the point where it is obvious that God cannot be outside time and be the creator of the Universe as a result of causality. In fact, Janey already put a neat little bow on the issue for us: “Because the universe is all of time and space, and since causality presuposses time and space, therefore the universe cannot have a cause.” Naturally, whereas William Lane Craig fancies himself a student of broad, theoretical science – that is, he has read the Conservapedia page on physics – one would hope he would understand the problem being presented to him, thus causing him to surrender the point and never again use the First Cause argument. But instead, we get this:

I must confess that I’m baffled why atheists would think that causation presupposes time and space or at least time. Janey and John, you need to ask them what they mean by “causality” and what reason they have for believing that it presupposes time and space. They’re the ones raising the objection, so make them shoulder their burden of proof. After all, it’s not just obvious that causality presupposes time and space. So ask them for their argument.

No problem, bucko. Causality is a reference to force. Force is mass multiplied by acceleration. Acceleration is the change in velocity over time. Ergo, for there to be a force on something – that is, for something to be caused – time is necessary. Without time, there can be no change in velocity; without velocity there can be no change in acceleration; without acceleration, we have no coherent idea of what force even is, much less a way to measure it.

You’re welcome, Janey.

Filed under: Astronomy/Cosmology/Physics, Creationism | Tagged: , , | Leave a comment »

HubPages

Posted on September 3, 2012 by Michael

I’ve started a HubPages account purely for the sake of seeing if I can generate any money from it. I don’t know if I’m going to stick with it or not – it depends on return – but I figured it’s worth checking out. The only real downside is that I can’t republish posts I’ve made here. In fact, I only noticed that restriction after I had started to transfer this post over to my new account. As a result, the URL doesn’t make any sense on my first post. If I can figure out a way to change it, I will, but it isn’t looking like HubPages is as user friendly as WordPress.

UPDATE: Apparently quoting another article after attributing the quote to said article is considered plagiarism by HubPages. Maybe I’ll hold off on writing for these people until they figure out what standard blogging practices are and how the Internet works.

SECOND UPDATE: This is their last chance.

Filed under: Personal | Tagged: | Leave a comment »