It astounds me that anyone takes Pascal’s Wager seriously.
Filed under: Misc Tagged: | Pascal's Wager, Thought of the day
Author
Michael holds a BA in Biology with a minor in Philosophy. He likes to spend his free time hiking and defending science, though not usually at the same time. Contrary to popular (but not scientific) belief, the positive and appropriate perception of science is undermined by religion, alternative medicine, the U.S. education system, and most science journalists.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Michael on Whoa 
Jason Newell (@LikeW… on Whoa Michael on Wear sunscreen Ian on Wear sunscreen mike caster on Dr. Oz is a piece of shit David A Williams on Your definition of “clic… MJones on Thought of the day Michael on Christopher Maloney and the la… Grace Jewell on Christopher Maloney and the la… Michael on A bad rebuttal Top Posts
- What killed Andreas Moritz?
- Why circumcision is a very good thing
- Andreas Moritz is a stupid, dangerous man
- Andreas Moritz is dead
- What's the ethical argument against incest?
- Don't do business with Bill Groome of Madhatter Magic Shop
- Why Natural Selection is Not Random
- Dr. Oz is a piece of shit
- Deuteronomy is just weird
- Naturopaths are dangerous quacks
Enlightenment Counter
- 891,250 people have made their lives better.
Categories
Archives
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
Calendar
Blogroll
Facebook Pages
Random posts
Science
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. WP Designer.
Yes, it’s always amazed me that it’s supposedly such a knock-down argument when it’s no different in principle to buyIng a lottery ticket because of the massive benefit if you win, versus the negligible outlay if you lose – only in this case we have no idea if the prize money actually exists.
And would the Big Guy Upstairs who evidently created me so as not to believe in him, then be pleased if I bowed down and worshipped him (thus going against his design) just because of Pascal’s “Oh we’ll, what would it hurt?” sophistry?