For the Sake of Science

The Internet just became a slightly better place

7 Responses

1. 

   Datechguy does not grasp evolutionary theory « For the Sake of Science, on September 25, 2012 at 6:02 pm said:

   […] mentioned a little while ago that the Internet became a better place when Roxeanne de Luca ceased her blogging activities. As it turns out, her old website is gone, but she is still blogging at some site called Datechguy. […]
2. 

   Roxeanne de Luca, on September 28, 2012 at 4:45 pm said:

   Like you’re the Flying Spaghetti Monster’s gift to the blogosphere, Mr. “I’m so smart, I take almost a decade to get through college!”.

   What’s your obsession with me? You tried to say I was anti-science, got smacked down because I have an engineering degree, and haven’t learned?

   Kid, most people make that mistake – mouthing off to someone smarter, more talented, more accomplished, but thinking that the person is a total doofus. Most people then LEARN from the mistake, rather than doubling down on immature and stupid.

   There is no evidence that you are more scientific, logical, or smarter than I am. As I keep saying, all evidence points the other way, and your deliberate ignorance of that makes YOU the one who is cray-cray.
3. 

   Michael Hawkins, on September 28, 2012 at 5:54 pm said:

   For Exhibit A, we have this:

   You tried to say I was anti-science, got smacked down because I have an engineering degree, and haven’t learned?

   There are creationists with biology degrees, too.

   For Exhibit B, we have this:

   [T]he Left is more concerned with eliminating traditional family structures than with advancing the well-being of children. What this state has just told paedophiles is that it’s open season on little kids, and if the mother gets creeped out, said paedophile can sue to have visitation with her child.

   Crazy.

   There is no evidence that you are more scientific…

   I have not once confused the process of development with the subjective definition of humanity. I have never argued that condom use should be discouraged because people are not using them frequently enough to combat infection. I have never claimed that HIV has decreased in South Africa because of greater abstinence only programs and discouraged condom use. I have never told someone that I had been offered no data when not only had a link to a study been provided to me but statistics from said study were used to compose a full three paragraphs. You have done all these things.

   …logical

   Only moments ago you argued that you can’t be anti-science because you have a certain degree.

   …or smarter than I am.

   You should review the facts that have been presented.

   …your deliberate ignorance of that makes YOU the one who is cray-cray.

   I’m not the one who thinks it’s a big, left-wing conspiracy that California, along with several other states, wants to make it so that a child can have more than two legal guardians because liberals want to see children molested and otherwise abused.
4. 

   Michael Hawkins, on September 28, 2012 at 5:55 pm said:

   By the by, I look forward to your first use of a fact.
5. 

   But I thought people with degrees couldn’t be anti-science?! « For the Sake of Science, on October 6, 2012 at 4:42 pm said:

   […] old friend Roxeanne de Luca recently had this to say about her anti-science nature: You tried to say I was anti-science, got smacked down because I have an engineering degree, and […]
6. 

   GIAYPPPAMQFLTHGXAG, on August 29, 2018 at 8:49 am said:

   My brother suggested I may like this website. He was once entirely right. This publish truly made my day. You cann’t imagine just how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
7. 

   Michael, on September 1, 2018 at 12:32 am said:

   I know you’re a spammer, but I approved your comment anyway. I just removed your link.