A key definition of delusion is that one holds beliefs not based upon evidence. There’s more to it than that, but that is a key component. It’s also a key component of faith.
Filed under: Misc | Tagged: Delusion, Thought of the day | 13 Comments »
A key definition of delusion is that one holds beliefs not based upon evidence. There’s more to it than that, but that is a key component. It’s also a key component of faith.
Filed under: Misc | Tagged: Delusion, Thought of the day | 13 Comments »
…but I really can’t help but feel a bit like Will when it comes to explaining some things to people. And I don’t mean the sort of complicated things that are so basic to him. I mean legitimately basic things, especially as they pertain to philosophy.
Filed under: Philosophy | Tagged: Genius, Good Will Hunting, Matt Damon | 3 Comments »
Republican policies have traditionally increased the income gap.
Filed under: Misc | Tagged: Income gap, Thought of the day | 15 Comments »
One of the members of my Kilimanjaro group took some video of the trip and edited a few things together for YouTube. With his permission (which I figured I’d get since the video isn’t available in a public search) I present it to you. (In case you think I’m worth trying to see, I don’t make much of an appearance.)
Filed under: Hiking | Tagged: Chombo, Kilimanjaro, Lemosho | Leave a comment »
I just got my copy of Stephen Hawking’s “The Grand Design”. I’ve only looked at it briefly, so a full report is not possible at this time. However, I think it’s worth quoting a section he has on miracles.
It is Laplace who is usually credited with first clearly postulating scientific determinism: Given the state of the universe at one time, a complete set of laws fully determines both the future and the past. This would exclude the possibility or miracles or an active role for God. The scientific determinism that Laplace formulated is the modern scientists’s answer to question two (‘Are there any exceptions to the laws, i.e., miracles?’). It is, in fact, the basis of all modern science, and a principle that is important throughout this book. A scientific law is not a scientific law if it holds only when some supernatural being decides not to intervene. (Page 30)
Emphasis mine.
This is a concise account of why the belief in miracles is so anti-science: science tells us ‘These are laws which are true at all points and all times within the observable Universe’ whereas a believer in miracles inherently says, ‘No, no. These aren’t laws at all. They can be made untrue at any point and any time, and in fact some of them have not been valid in certain places and at certain times.’ Of course, the believer doesn’t actually say that. But his belief in miracles means that.
Filed under: Astronomy/Cosmology/Physics, Atheism/Humanism, Science | Tagged: Miracles, Stephen Hawking, The Grand Design | 2 Comments »
The new season begins tonight at 10pm EST on FX. Watch it.
Filed under: Humor | Tagged: FX, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia | Leave a comment »
I couldn’t have possibly asked for a better group of people on my Kilimanjaro trip.
Filed under: Misc | Tagged: Kilimanjaro, Thought of the day | Leave a comment »
No, not from the medical scene, that place where he keeps causing such harm. Just his sock puppet Wikipedia page has been proposed for deletion. And you can help.
Go to the discussion page for deletion and say why his page ought to be taken down.
Moritz, like Christopher Maloney, wants to make himself look legitimate. Unfortunately, creating such an appearance on the web isn’t that difficult. But what this also means is that it’s possible to create an honest web presence that these quacks must face. That has happened with these two particular quacks and they can be considered defeated in that regard. Of course, they’re still harming innocent people with their pseudo-science and lies, and so they remain a significant danger to society.
With that slightly in mind, I’ve been editing Moritz’s page with a short criticism showing his discord with science. I haven’t been going to the significant length required to explain why the guy is a dishonest, thieving, lying, scummy charlatan, however, because I’m not doing much more than having fun. Since his page has already been recommended for deletion (I was attempting to make the recommendation at the same time as the person who actually did it), he will soon have one less platform from which he can tell lies anyway. Right now I’m enjoying making him freak out over the insignificance of temporal Wikipedia edits. That’s why I say I only have his danger “slightly in mind”; this is more about watching him get cranky. He is quite the baby.
Anyway. Let’s make sure this guy’s malarkey is never seen as legitimate. Help delete his scummy, lying page.
Filed under: Pure bullshit | Tagged: Andreas Moritz, wikipedia | 6 Comments »