Link.
Filed under: Politics and Social | Tagged: Breakdown, Pie chart, Planned Parenthood |
Author
Recent Comments
septrose14 on Reddit layoffs shelldigger on Thought of the day The Sauciest Duck on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Michael on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Stephen Moreton on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Mele Kalikimaka | Fo… on Merry Christmas Mele Kalikimaka | Fo… on Mele Kalikimaka somdeblahiriyahoocoi… on Thought of the day Michael on Wuhan virus and one last… Quick correction | F… on The A-Unicornist, Bernie Bro…
For the Sake of Science 
The Rethuglicans were not allowed to rape and pillage upon Planned Parenthood this week.
Boehner (or Bonehead or boner or however it is spelled) was trying to lead the party of xenophobes and misogynists to eliminate all those services so that more people would die and taxes could be lowered more for the wealthy and to be able to produce more corporate welfare, but they had to back off their evil intentions.
You should write propaganda posters Bob. I imagine you would be very effective at whipping up hate and discontent. You and Sen Schumer have a conference call to go over what slander is going to be spread this week?
Planned parenthood wouldn’t go under if the feds stopped giving them charity. You are free to give as much as you want Bob, same for you Michael.
You are the propagandist extrordinaire, Nate, with your ridiculous justifications of corporate welfare and justifications for Repubicans to remove regulations so that companies can foul the water, land and air and airwaves and your silly justifications of raking rights away from working people and unions si thst corporations can try to return the US back to the era of sweatshops.
Oh yeah, also why do you hate working people, women and minorities, Nate? Does theology drive that like it does for the tea party?
Thats exactly what I’m talking about Bob, you think life is a zero sum game. Everything one person has they must have taken from someone else.
If you knew anything of my actual feelings you would know I have no desire for any kind of corporate welfare.
You just keep up your unfounded, illogical (and hateful) narrative like a good little liberal.
Clueless Nate, I know it us not a zero sum game but you and your right wing cronies think thst way. I know we can benefit everyone but Republicans are ONLY for the wealthy. I expect you to accuse me of doing what you do. That is the right wing agenda. Let’s hear more nullshit from you. You spew it like a fire hose.
Sure Bob, whatever makes you feel like your contributing.
Sure, Nate. Deny that the Republicans are trying to reduce spending on programs so they can reduce taxes more for the wealthy and corporations. Bold face lies are another right wing strategy.
Again, whatever makes you feel like you are contributing, I know that can be important in ones sunset years.
Why would you want to tax corporations at all? To me it shows a lack of understanding of what a corporation is.
Go explain it to yourself as you masturbate while thinking you actually understand anything Nate. I know your body is revolting on you and you are barely keeping alive, so go ahead and rant your foolishness.
Once again you are such an asshole, putting words in my mouth that I never said or implied. You are disgusting, as usual.
I’m not sure what words I put in your mouth, but your mouth certainly needs some washing out if you ask me.
Here are examples of real economics and NOT the zero sum game of Republicans:
http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2011/04/the_budget_deal_isnt_a_comprom.php
http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2011/04/obamas_spokesman_declares_obam.php
Here is another reality check that shows the conservative approach is just plain wrong:
Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%
http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105?currentPage=all&wpisrc=nl_wonk
Too bad incomes for everyone increase every year, bob. Take a look at the census going back as far as you would like. It has always outpaced inflation, save for short periods.
Yeah, who has a zero sum view of things? More complaining about the top 1% when what they have has no bearing on what everyone else has.
You haven’t presented any good economics here, you’re trying to peddle the bad.
Too bad that you can’t comprehend. Real incomes are going down. Your response is a lie. Those three articles are clear and are common sense. Those are the economics that worked in the past.
YOU and the Republicans have a zero sum view. Must…cut…taxes…and…must…cut…programs. Like zombies, that dogmatic mantra. Voodoo economics.Laughter at Laffer curves. Supply side economics. All complete bullshit nonsense.
I don’t care what lies and dogma you put out next.
The original subject of this article is about how Republicans were stopped in cutting programs that save lives. They are for killing people. I guess you are also, Nate.
Time for you to rant and rave again to yourself.
Sure bob. I don’t see any reason to respond to you when you waste bandwidth with libelous statements like “republicans are for killing people”.
Plus all the other nonsense that shows you clearly have no grasp of anything even close to the realm of economics. Why don’t you actually read some Keynes, particularly his later stuff.
Hey Bob, I don’t want to wade into most of this stuff here, but I followed your Scienceblog link about deficits equaling private sector savings and I’ve had a very positive, civil and spirited discussion with some of the commentators there.
Before you chalk up the Deficits = Savings theory to be factual, you should keep in mind that this is a very unorthodox view of economics – even from leftwing views, and the whole school has been written off as incorrect by Paul Krugman – the last person I would call a right winger. Please let me know if you have any further thoughts