Filed under: Humor | Tagged: Christianity, Ta dah |
Author
Recent Comments
septrose14 on Reddit layoffs shelldigger on Thought of the day The Sauciest Duck on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Michael on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Stephen Moreton on Chauvin and Rittenhouse Mele Kalikimaka | Fo… on Merry Christmas Mele Kalikimaka | Fo… on Mele Kalikimaka somdeblahiriyahoocoi… on Thought of the day Michael on Wuhan virus and one last… Quick correction | F… on The A-Unicornist, Bernie Bro…
For the Sake of Science 
Sorry about post number 1.
Except the Christianity one actually what the Bible literally says happened, whereas the atheism one is completely wrong. There was not nothing, what acted upon it was not nothing and not for no reason, and it absolutely did not “magically” rearrange… but the self-replicating bits did turn into dinosaurs, though. That’s a valid simplification.
insert “is” after 4th word.
– Oh, and by the way, all that atheism stuff isn’t really atheism, it’s belief in evolution and the Big Bang, which, although usually believed by atheists, is not related to atheism.
They are both simply childish jabs at another beliefs.
I didn’t make the graphic but I did think it was humorous. I wasn’t really trying to make any claims about what the typical atheist believes.
Quick, someone lock up that nutbag Jesus. Sorry Slater but there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the bibles are anything but fiction.
It has been proven that the new testament was written dozens of years after the alleged events and there are no documents of any of those events happening.
Too bad that SOME people misunderstand cause and effect and the definitions of simple and complex systems and how the world works.
Slater your spewings are just frothing at the mouth. No one takes what you say seriously. There is no ‘belief’ in evolution, only confidence in all the overwhelming evidence and facts that concur with the theory.Also, evolution and the big bang have nothing to do with each other. Only creationist cretins say things like that.It just shows how ignorant you really are.
There you are slater, even if you agree this guy will still go after you foaming at the mouth. An excellent spokesman for his viewpoints.
Nate: time to go suck eggs again. Of course not one fact to counter what I said. How typical.
If I were responding to what you said that would be worth hearing. Since I was only commenting on how you said it.
You catch more flies with honey bob, “cleverly” taunting them won’t work. You resemble, in your actions, the very type of christian you hate the most.
Egg, Nate, go suck
How well written. That sort of thing really helps. Makes you seem reasonable and level headed. As opposed to slater here. What kind of bigot is he bob?
Also, for the record, he never said the bible was fact. See what you want to see bob, see what you want to see.
Even if the new testament was written “dozens” of years after the fact, that’s a damn sight closer to the events than most writings from the ancient world. What we know of Alexander the great, for example, was written sometime in the first and second centuries AD. He died sometime before 300 BC (I don’t recall the exact date). If you assume something to be worthless due to a lapse of 30-50 years than I have at least two research papers I shouldn’t have bothered with on Alexander.
What nonsense! Written 400-500 years after the fact!
Sadly contemporary works are extremely scarce from before 1000 AD, although not non-existent.
Soo… you’re saying that if something is true, everyone believes in it automatically? Is that your claim?
I’m hoping you are just having a bad day and not really thinking about what you are saying, because that’s quite likely the most stupid comment I’ve seen in here, easily beating any of the religious ones.
Of course you still have to believe that evolution is true. I also have to believe that gravity is true, and that the keyboard in front of me exists. Even though all of those are true, it’s quite possible to deny them.
Which is exactly why I named them both.
The text linked to by nate mentions both the coming about of the universe AND simple life turning into dinosaurs.
Are you saying that because they are unrelated, you are not allowed to mention both?
If you’re angry for other reasons, I understand – but please think before speaking. This is embarrassing.
Btw:
I’ve been trying to understand, but I really have no idea whatsoever why you would say this to me. Have I mentioned it at all? Have I given you the impression through other means that I thought the bibles were nonfiction?
How on earth did you even connect the truth of the Bible to this entire thread?
I didn’t read your trash spew Nate. I am sure there are no facts in it, just warped opinion. Go suck eggs, Nate. Next time mind your own business instead of interjecting while mouthing your holier-than-thou stance.
Slater, you seem very incoherent. When you actually think before you write then we can discuss. I see you learned from Nate the disgusting trait of attributing thoughts to others concocted from your fevered mind. How disgusting!
Right. I’m incoherent. Another excellent way of avoiding answering anything.
I’m honestly uncertain as to whether you are just trolling, or you really think I’ve said anything incoherent or illogical, which would of course mean you’ve failed to read what it says.
Unfortunately it seems you are unwilling to even discuss it on a reasonably mature level, so I guess there’s nothing else to do than let you live in your fantasy world, where everyone else is against you.
He is almost always unwilling. I think he must be suffering from atychiphobia. Just as the whole rest of the country is xenophobic and homophobic and obamaphobic…..
I love that the person who is against the post is calling me, who supports this post a troll. So typical of warped right wing minds. Do something then claim everyone else is doing it. Slater, you really are learning at the feet of Nate…LOL
There you go again, Nate, assigning stances to me that I didn’t take. So disgusting and typical of you – no facts, no evidence, just spew smack. This is right out of the right wing nut bag playbook. Sarah Palin would be proud of both out you.
Are you even conservative slater?
And there’s the proof you didn’t understand a word I said. It was pretty obvious I was very much in favour of the post – even Nate obviously got that right away.
Nate:
Of course not. I’m from Denmark, we don’t even have conservatives here :P I’m a socialist-liberal, have never believed in any sort of deity and certainly don’t believe in any religious values, which should be extremely clear from any of my other posts here, where Bob has agreed with me before.
It’s quite obvious he just misunderstood me somewhere, but the mature way of dealing with that would have been to at least listen to the explanation, instead of just shouting insults and sticking his fingers in his ears.
The new testament thing is really what got me the most. While its generally accepted that many more people than we previously though could read, very few could write, it often took a long time for things to be written down. Of course this affects accuracy but still its a very short lapse.
50 years of no record is a very short lapse? Even with all the written records of WW II and the films and videos and millions of participants, there are more and more people now who deny that the holocaust happened. A few stories written 50 years after the alleged happenings have no credibility whatsoever. There were plenty of real documents of the day and none of them record any of it.
There were not four gospels, there were 50 or more but the council in the second century cherry picked among the various fictions. That is how Christianity was defined.
You can’t equate What happens in modern times with the way the ancient world was.
50 years, historically speaking, is a very short time for something to be recorded in the ancient world.
Except for all the real things that happened and were recorded immediately.
Yes. As opposed to all of those false things we read about in the various texts on Alexander (sticking with this example) written 400+ years later.
Recorded by whom? One of the few people that could write? If only it were so Bob, history and archaeology would be so much easier.
Your ignorance of the times is showing. There were dozens of scribes in Jerusalem at the time. They recorded the crops, they recorded the tax collections, they recorded the leaders and politicians goings-on and they recorded public issues like hangings and crime, etc. There also were religious scribes at the time who recorded the goings-on at the temple. If is brought out by biblical scholars, including Bart Erhman that is is strange that all this recording went on and not one mention of any hint of any of the biblical fictions. Go read up what the many biblical scholars say about this, since I no longer wish to be your educator.
If you are serving as my educator than you are doing a very poor job.
I’m not even defending the idea that any of the bible is true. I have only been addressing your claim that a gap of 30 or more years in the recording renders something inadmissible.
As far as the rest of your post, do you have any idea how many people claiming to be the messiah were put to death/banished/flogged? Its hardly of note that the events of one man (be he God or not) went unrecorded.
If you find responding to me distasteful than I don’t see why you do it. I doubt anyone has a gun to your head making you type.