A man in Texas and a man in Arizona narrowly avoided being murdered this week. In each instance (despite the poorly written article on the man from Texas) the reasoning had to do with inadequate anti-murder protection. That in itself isn’t absolutely awful, but a far, far, far, far, far superior reason would be that murder is wrong. And two wrongs don’t make a right – even if the second wrong helps emotionally.
I can’t wait for the U.S. to catch up with the modern world.
Filed under: News | Tagged: Death penalty |
For the Sake of Science 
We’ll get him, I’m not worried.
The good ole USA ranks Ist in the western world for murder rates.
We don’t get it. Murder by the state is still murder and it sanctions murder as a preventative measure! Prevention? This condum has a whole in it…it’s not preventing anything! In fact, in a way, it is licensing murder!!!!
Take a look around, you’ll find that enacting a death penalty does nothing at all as far as being a deterrent.
Using the death penalty has the real effect.
Are you kidding? The states with the highest murder rates are the states with the largest number of capital punishmet cases…look it up,,
Sure, but that doesn’t really tell you anything.