For the Sake of Science

Thought of the day

9 Responses

1. 

   Sean, on February 22, 2010 at 11:58 pm said:

   Aye, ye sure do.

   Cheers!
2. 

   Pareidolius, on February 23, 2010 at 12:23 am said:

   Maloney was just amateur, softcore woo. Mortiz, now that’s triple XXX, hardcore, burn-your-retinas woo. Keep lifting those rocks, you never know what you’ll find under there.
3. 

   KKBundy, on February 23, 2010 at 12:46 am said:

   Glad to see you back, Mike. I still don’t understand it all, but what I do know is Science good, censorship bad!

   The Blessed Atheist Bible Study @ http://blessedatheist.com/
4. 

   Adrian Cockcroft, on February 23, 2010 at 2:42 am said:

   Heres an interesting analysis of homeopathy http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/22/science-homeopathy-clinical-trials
5. 

   Slater, on February 23, 2010 at 3:57 am said:

   Apparently you do.

   I have only heard of you just now, through PZ, but you’re going right in my RSS reader.
6. 

   Arnold T Pants, on February 23, 2010 at 6:45 am said:

   Streisand Effect FTW!
7. 

   biodork, on February 23, 2010 at 8:32 am said:

   Hey! Glad to see that the blog’s back up – congratulations! I look forward to reading more of your posts.
8. 

   Michael N., on February 23, 2010 at 9:09 am said:

   Nice work with the hub-bub…it was entertaining and educational :) …the two best ‘e’ words.
9. 

   Derek Beggs, on February 23, 2010 at 9:34 am said:

   Well done on getting your site back, I wouldn’t have noticed it otherwise and am glad I have now found it.
   Keep up the good work.